This free audiobook course follows David Bercot’s The Kingdom That Turned the World Upside Down, a study of the kingdom of God as taught by Jesus and understood in early Christian history. It opens with the Crusaders’ siege of Jerusalem as a stark contrast to Jesus’ kingdom of love, enemy-love, and nonresistance.
From there, the chapters compare ancient Israel’s earthly kingdom with the present reality of Christ’s kingdom, then examine practical kingdom commitments involving wealth, honesty, marriage, divorce, enemies, government, and separation from the world.
The course also traces how Bercot believes the church’s witness changed after Constantine, how theology and church-state power reshaped Christian practice, and how later movements such as the Waldensians, Lollards, Anabaptists, and others carried forward kingdom themes. The lessons fit together as a historical and biblical argument that Jesus’ teachings are not optional ideals but the pattern for citizens of his kingdom.
The opening chapter recounts the Crusaders’ siege of Jerusalem and the massacre that followed. Bercot uses that scene to ask whether such violence fits the kingdom of love and enemy-love that Jesus planted.
- Why begin a book on the kingdom of God with the Crusades?
- How does the siege of Jerusalem contrast with Jesus’ teaching?
- Did the Crusaders advance or harm the kingdom Bercot describes?
This chapter describes ancient Israel as an earthly kingdom with territory, national identity, law, material blessings, and armed defense. Bercot presents it as a tutor pointing toward a greater kingdom not of this world.
- What made ancient Israel a right-side-up kingdom?
- How were Israel’s blessings and punishments earthly and material?
- Why does Bercot say Israel was not the final form of God’s kingdom?
Bercot explains John the Baptist’s announcement, Jesus’ preaching of the kingdom, and the four elements of a kingdom: ruler, subjects, domain, and laws. He emphasizes that Christ’s kingdom is already present, without earthly borders or military force.
- What was the central theme of Jesus’ preaching?
- Who are the subjects of the kingdom of God?
- In what sense is the kingdom already present?
- Why is this kingdom different from earthly kingdoms?
Using the example of citizenship and allegiance, this chapter argues that Jesus requires undivided loyalty from kingdom citizens. Bercot introduces the Sermon on the Mount as the starting point for the kingdom’s values and laws.
- What kind of allegiance does Jesus require?
- Why does Bercot compare kingdom citizenship to naturalization?
- How should Christians read the Sermon on the Mount?
This lesson examines Jesus’ commands about treasure, mammon, contentment, and poverty of spirit. Bercot argues that kingdom citizens must let material things become servants rather than masters.
- What does Jesus mean by not laying up treasures on earth?
- Why does Bercot say no one can serve both God and mammon?
- What does poverty of spirit look like in daily life?
- How can materialism affect family and spiritual life?
Bercot discusses Jesus’ command not to swear oaths and connects it to a kingdom standard of simple truthfulness. The chapter also criticizes dishonest religious claims and argues that deception is incompatible with Christ.
- Why does Jesus command his followers not to swear oaths?
- What does it mean for yes to mean yes and no to mean no?
- How does dishonesty damage Christian witness?
- Why does Bercot treat false miracles as a serious problem?
This lesson presents Bercot’s reading of Jesus’ teachings on divorce and remarriage. He argues that Jesus narrowed what had been permitted and calls readers to investigate the relevant passages honestly.
- What did Jesus teach about divorce?
- How does Bercot interpret Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 7?
- Why does this teaching offend many hearers?
- Did Jesus expand or narrow earlier divorce permissions?
Beginning a section on nonresistance, Bercot explores Jesus’ commands to turn the other cheek, go the second mile, and love enemies. He argues that these teachings touch everyday conflicts as well as war.
- Why does Bercot call enemy-love the biggest stumbling block?
- What does turning the other cheek require?
- Is nonresistance the same as weakness?
- How should Christians respond to enemies in ordinary life?
This chapter addresses common objections to nonresistance, including self-defense, family protection, and military service. Bercot also appeals to early Christian writers who answered similar criticisms from pagan society.
- What if someone threatens a Christian’s family?
- Can love of family override Jesus’ commands?
- How did early Christians answer charges that they would not defend the empire?
- Can Christians divide allegiance between Christ and Caesar?
Bercot considers Scripture passages sometimes used to challenge nonresistance, including Jesus’ words about a sword, the centurion, Cornelius, and apostolic examples. He argues that these texts do not overturn Jesus’ kingdom commands.
- Did Jesus authorize war when he said he came to bring a sword?
- Does the Roman centurion prove approval of military life?
- What can be concluded from Cornelius’s conversion?
- How did the early disciples respond to persecution?
This lesson surveys what Bercot says Scripture reveals about earthly governments. He emphasizes God’s ultimate authority, the temporary nature of worldly kingdoms, and Satan’s involvement in the kingdoms of men.
- What does Scripture reveal about earthly kingdoms?
- Does victory in war prove God’s approval?
- In what sense are rulers God’s servants?
- How does Satan relate to the kingdoms of this world?
Bercot explains the tension of living as citizens of God’s kingdom while also under earthly governments. He argues for respect and ordinary obedience to civil authorities, while reserving ultimate allegiance for Christ when commands conflict.
- Which government should Christians obey?
- What belongs to Caesar and what belongs to God?
- What should Christians do when Caesar’s law conflicts with Christ’s law?
- How should Christians treat soldiers and police officers?
This chapter reflects on Jesus’ statement that his kingdom is not of this world and applies it to his subjects. Bercot critiques churches that follow worldly values, whether ancient, medieval, or modern political patterns.
- What does it mean that Jesus’ kingdom is not of this world?
- How are Christ’s subjects not of the world?
- Why does Bercot criticize the church’s conformity to society?
- Is alignment with a political party the same as kingdom faithfulness?
Bercot distinguishes kingdom Christianity from both right-wing God-and-country activism and left-wing peace-and-justice activism. He argues that Jesus came to transform individuals and call them into his kingdom, not to Christianize worldly governments.
- Is kingdom Christianity the same as peace activism?
- Why does Bercot reject both right-wing and left-wing political religion?
- Did Jesus try to reform the Roman Empire?
- How should kingdom Christians view their country?
This lesson presents Jesus himself as the pattern of kingdom living in first-century Judea under Roman rule. Bercot also describes early Jewish Christians who did not join the Jewish war but fled from Jerusalem.
- Did Jesus live the kingdom life he taught?
- Why did Jesus not join the Jewish struggle against Rome?
- How did early Jewish Christians respond to the war with Rome?
- What does kingdom allegiance do to earthly patriotism?
Bercot argues that nonresistance and separation from the world were the historic practices of pre-Constantinian Christianity. He supports this by citing early Christian writers such as Clement, Tertullian, Origen, Cyprian, and Lactantius.
- Was nonresistance an early Christian position?
- What did pre-Constantinian Christians say about violence?
- How did early Christians view public office and worldly affairs?
- What did early writers say when Caesar’s commands opposed God’s law?
Beginning a section on the gospel of the kingdom, Bercot contrasts the “Jesus road” with what he calls easy believism. He emphasizes faith, commitment, obedience, and a Spirit-lived relationship with Christ.
- What is the gospel of the kingdom?
- Why does Bercot begin with Jesus’ teachings rather than isolated proof texts?
- How do faith, commitment, and obedience relate in this chapter?
- Why does Bercot say Jesus’ yoke is easy only in a kingdom relationship?
This lesson discusses entering the kingdom through freedom from sin, faith, repentance, baptism, and the new birth, drawing heavily on Acts and other New Testament passages. Bercot also stresses the present and future aspects of salvation.
- How does a person enter the kingdom of God?
- What role do faith, repentance, and baptism play in Bercot’s presentation?
- Why does he describe salvation as having a future aspect?
- What place does the Apostles’ Creed have in early Christian faith?
After strong calls to commitment, Bercot warns against judgmental and self-righteous attitudes. He urges readers to examine themselves by Jesus’ teachings, especially in the Sermon on the Mount.
- Why does Bercot warn kingdom Christians against superiority?
- What does Jesus’ command not to judge require?
- How should believers use the Sermon on the Mount for self-examination?
- What does Bercot mean by “kingdom Christians”?
Bercot argues that kingdom citizens are commissioned to proclaim the kingdom openly. He traces this from Jesus’ preaching to the apostles’ refusal to stop speaking and the spread of the kingdom message under persecution.
- Why can’t the kingdom be kept secret?
- What did Jesus send his disciples to preach?
- Why did the apostles refuse to stop teaching about Jesus?
- How does witness affect the spiritual health of kingdom Christians?
This chapter begins Bercot’s account of how the church changed after a period of peace and the rise of Constantine. He describes church leaders gaining favor, state involvement in church affairs, and the weakening of earlier kingdom separation.
- What happened to the kingdom gospel after the early centuries?
- How did peace and imperial favor affect the church?
- Why does Bercot see Constantine’s support as spiritually dangerous?
- How did church and state begin to mix?
Bercot discusses the Council of Nicaea, Arian controversy, and the effects of making theological definitions central to orthodoxy. He argues that persecution and extra-biblical tests of orthodoxy helped make the Bible seem unsafe for ordinary believers.
- What issue led to the Council of Nicaea?
- How does Bercot explain nature and order in relation to Father and Son?
- Why does he object to persecution of heretics?
- How did theology become tied to church authority?
This lesson asks whether the fourth-century changes were God’s blessing or a test. Bercot argues that Jesus’ teachings do not change and uses John the Baptist, the rich young ruler, and warning signs about worldly approval to make the point.
- Was God changing the rules after Constantine?
- How could fourth-century Christians have tested the changes?
- Why does Bercot appeal to John the Baptist’s example?
- What warning does Jesus give about being praised by the world?
Bercot describes the Constantinian hybrid as a move back toward Old Testament patterns while keeping New Testament theology and ordinances. He explains how this affected wealth, oaths, nonresistance, divorce, and the church’s relationship to worldly power.
- What does Bercot mean by the Constantinian hybrid?
- How did Old Testament patterns reshape Christian practice?
- What happened to teachings on wealth, oaths, nonresistance, and divorce?
- How does Bercot connect this change to Jesus’ kingdom parables?
This chapter acknowledges benefits associated with Constantine’s reforms, then argues that the promised Christian golden age did not materialize. Bercot points to civil wars, imperial collapse, and ongoing medieval patterns as evidence against the hybrid.
- What benefits did the Constantinian changes appear to bring?
- Why does Bercot say the golden age never happened?
- How did Constantine’s successors act after his death?
- What did the fall of the Western Roman Empire reveal, in Bercot’s argument?
Bercot presents Augustine as a major defender of the Constantinian hybrid and criticizes his approaches to just war, predestination, persecution, and interpretation. The chapter contrasts Augustine’s system with a direct reading of Jesus’ kingdom teachings.
- Why does Bercot call Augustine an apologist for the hybrid?
- How does he critique just war reasoning?
- What objections does he raise to Augustine’s predestination teaching?
- How did Augustine’s approach affect ordinary reading of the New Testament?
This lesson describes the growth of papal political power, the forged Donation of Constantine, corrupt papal rule, and medieval persecution. Bercot argues that changing societal norms cannot excuse practices that violate Jesus’ permanent commands.
- What was the Donation of Constantine?
- How did papal power grow after the fall of Rome?
- Why does Bercot discuss corrupt and violent medieval practices?
- Can societal norms excuse disobedience to Jesus’ commands?
Beginning the final section, Bercot looks at how kingdom Christianity continued outside the dominant institutional church. He discusses Donatists, reform-minded preachers such as Arnold of Brescia and Henry of Lausanne, and the poor and uneducated who took Jesus’ teachings literally.
- How did kingdom Christianity continue after the institutional church changed?
- What did Donatus mean by asking what the emperor had to do with the church?
- Why were reform preachers punished by church authorities?
- Why does Bercot emphasize the poor and uneducated in medieval kingdom movements?
Bercot presents the Waldensians as a major medieval kingdom movement beginning with Waldisius of Lyon. The chapter follows their poverty, public preaching, conflict with church authorities, and severe persecution.
- Who was Waldisius and how did the Waldensian movement begin?
- Why did the Waldensians insist on preaching publicly?
- How did church authorities respond to the Poor in Spirit?
- What persecutions did Waldensian communities endure?
This chapter contrasts kingdom movements with Augustinian reform movements. Bercot discusses Wycliffe and the Lollards, noting both Augustinian features and later Lollard traits that resembled medieval kingdom movements.
- What is the difference between kingdom reform and Augustinian reform?
- How did Augustinian reformers view church and state?
- What did Wycliffe teach about rulers and predestination?
- How did the Lollards later take on kingdom-movement characteristics?
Bercot recounts the Waldensians’ contact with Swiss Reformers and the decisions at Chanforon. He argues that the Waldensians surrendered key kingdom practices, including itinerant preaching, voluntary poverty, and nonresistance.
- How did the Waldensians encounter the Swiss Reformers?
- What concerns did some Waldensian representatives have?
- What was decided at Chanforon?
- Why does Bercot see this meeting as the end of their kingdom witness?
This lesson describes Calvin’s Geneva as an attempt to build a state modeled more like Old Testament Israel than Jesus’ kingdom. Bercot focuses on the Consistory, discipline, the execution of Servetus, and Calvin’s defense of the magistrate’s sword.
- What kind of society did Calvin seek to establish in Geneva?
- How did the Consistory discipline citizens?
- Why does Bercot discuss the execution of Servetus?
- How did Calvin justify Christian use of the sword?
Bercot describes the rise of new kingdom movements during and after the Reformation, especially Anabaptists and later groups that emphasized nonresistance, simple theology, obedience, and rejection of oaths and materialism. He notes that these groups did not share every detail of theology but held to the Apostles’ Creed and kingdom lifestyle teachings.
- How did Bible translation and printing help new kingdom movements arise?
- Why did early Anabaptists separate from Zwingli’s reform?
- What kingdom teachings did these movements emphasize?
- Why were both Catholic and Reformation authorities hostile to Anabaptists?
The closing chapter urges readers to weigh Bercot’s argument against the totality of Jesus’ teachings. He emphasizes Christianity as a relationship with Christ the King and calls readers to embrace the gospel of the kingdom if they find it faithful to Jesus’ words.
- What does Bercot want readers to remember from the book?
- Why does he say Christianity is relational rather than merely theological or mechanical?
- How should readers test his claims?
- What does it mean to treat Jesus as absolute rather than obsolete?